Friday, December 01, 2006
Flames Game Day-Columbus
|Record: 6-15-2||Record: 11-10-2|
I don't know whether Matty, Matt, Matt is going to throw anything up, so I'll just put up a quick post for all you Flames lovers out there, and let you run the show. The Blue Jackets stink, so the Flames should win this game. Then again--and it eats me up to say this--one of those 6 Blue Jackets victories on the year came against Calgary. Here's hoping both teams mutilate each other.
Prediction 0-0, with the Flames winning in the 27th round in OT.
MATT UPDATE, 708PM: this is a lame effort on my part, so I'll go with the lame prediction, that being a 2-1 Flames win (Langkow & Lundmark). I sincerely hope it's just me who's tentative. Go Flames.
MATT UPDATE, 936PM: KNEEEELLLLL!!!! Why yes, I am pissed that I didn't pick Super 7 numbers.
Actually, the lack of Matt's pick is ominous, he was on such a roll, its like a letter to Santa, c'mon Matt get your prediction in on time!
this is a lame effort on my part, so I'll go with the lame prediction, that being a 2-1 Flames win
Matt's been so money with his predictions lately that nobody in their right mind should watch this game.
I always forget just how much Roger Millions annoys me.
Am I the only one who thought that second Calgary goal was bush league?
The play really should stop if the goal judge is that trigger-happy (and the guy in Calgary has been trigger-happy for a while..).
I have a lab exam tomorrow morning and I'm finding a Calgary Columbus game (without booze, thanks to the exam) more interesting than the subject matter - how pathetic is that?
So Matt - Any 649 picks?
Yeah, the 2nd goal was cheap. There probably should have been a third. Call those 2 a saw-off.
Clearly, Matt needs to be burned as a witch.
Although, predicting a boring Flames game isn't that impressive.
Post a Comment