Thursday, September 14, 2006
Woo Hooo!!!
Here's the YouTube video of the shootout goals I mentioned in my Bears/Oilers rookie review the other night. Thanks to Julian for finding it for me. While the focus of Rishaug's piece is Schremp's lacrosse move gone wild--which missed the net--the real highlight is the goal by Dylan Stanley. They show it right before they show Schremp's missed attempt. Trust me, the buzz you hear after Schremp misses is nothing compared to the buzz after Stanley actually scored his. I'm telling you, the crowd went crazy. I felt like I was in an And 1 Streetball video. All it needed was a Chapellian "Oh Shit!!!" to be complete.
Note how Lupul verifies that he was right beside me when the goal occurred. He was even wearing that hat. And keep an eye out for the second attempt that Schremp actually scores on. It's near the end of the clip, and is pretty fan-dan-tastic on its own. So is Schremp doing his Tiger Woods impression at the end.
If anyone sees a YouTube video of the Stanley goal, holla at your boy.
Note how Lupul verifies that he was right beside me when the goal occurred. He was even wearing that hat. And keep an eye out for the second attempt that Schremp actually scores on. It's near the end of the clip, and is pretty fan-dan-tastic on its own. So is Schremp doing his Tiger Woods impression at the end.
If anyone sees a YouTube video of the Stanley goal, holla at your boy.
Comments:
OK. Your original description of this was, to put it charitably, insufficient.
Tell me about it. I'd pay 100 bucks to see the two of them do that shit for an hour.
You're right. The Stanley goal gets no mention at all - what a move!!! I know the focus of the piece is on Schremp, but still!
Might be a keeper, even on the fourth line.
Peanut Gallery: "BUT HE CAN'T PLAY DEFENCE!"
My response: Neither could 99% of the goons in the NHL for the past 60 years. But we found ice time for them. Think outside the box you savages.
The Stanley goal is actually in that clip - its near the begining, and you really have to watch for it, since it's not really mentioned.
The Stanley goal is actually in that clip - its near the begining, and you really have to watch for it, since it's not really mentioned.
I know, Pam. But TSN ran it alone as a Highlight of the Night. I meant that one. I should have been clearer. My bad.
I don't know if you are still interested in a better clip of the Stanley goal or not, but at the end of this CFRN News clip, they show it twice. They re-air parts of the TSN clip as well. Cheers.
Sarah
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHrtUtjotmA
The two that actually scored (Stanley and Schremp the second) blew my mind. The Woods impression wasn't bad, either. ;)
Post a Comment
<< Home
OK. Your original description of this was, to put it charitably, insufficient.
Tell me about it. I'd pay 100 bucks to see the two of them do that shit for an hour.
You're right. The Stanley goal gets no mention at all - what a move!!! I know the focus of the piece is on Schremp, but still!
Might be a keeper, even on the fourth line.
Peanut Gallery: "BUT HE CAN'T PLAY DEFENCE!"
My response: Neither could 99% of the goons in the NHL for the past 60 years. But we found ice time for them. Think outside the box you savages.
The Stanley goal is actually in that clip - its near the begining, and you really have to watch for it, since it's not really mentioned.
The Stanley goal is actually in that clip - its near the begining, and you really have to watch for it, since it's not really mentioned.
I know, Pam. But TSN ran it alone as a Highlight of the Night. I meant that one. I should have been clearer. My bad.
I don't know if you are still interested in a better clip of the Stanley goal or not, but at the end of this CFRN News clip, they show it twice. They re-air parts of the TSN clip as well. Cheers.
Sarah
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHrtUtjotmA
The two that actually scored (Stanley and Schremp the second) blew my mind. The Woods impression wasn't bad, either. ;)
Post a Comment
<< Home