Pages

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Yippee-ki-yay

**Three-and-a-half years later, the Flames are finally back in St. Pete to play the Lightning (530PM MT, Flames PPV). As bad as TB has been on the road, they've been that good at home: HmPP ranked 4th, HmPK ranked 5th, and a +21 goal differential (+56/-35) in 16 home games.

The Cavalier, in 16 HmGP, is 14G-17A-31Pts, +12, and seems to be doing it against the visitor's #1 line (looking at a number of their home games using Vic's H2H site, I'd say there's little doubt that Jarome and Vinny will be seeing a lot of each other tonight).

Although Marc Denis got the shootout win in Montreal on Tuesday, odds are that usual starter Johan Holmqvist will be in net tonight.

(Sidebar: my other idea for today's post header was from the same movie -- "Hey babe, I negotiate million dollar deals for breakfast. I think I can handle this Eurotrash." Also, I think I've blogged this before, but the biggest Hartford Wolf Pack fan on the internet once had this to say:
...the worst player in Wolf Pack history?-- Holmqvist gets my vote, hands down.

Late bloomer, shurely.)

**Thumbs up to Jardine for getting the ball rolling on Olympic roster spitballing! Here's my guess, about exactly 2 years until the actual roster is named:

The main thought -- concern? -- I had in the 15 minutes I spent looking at this was that while Canada could probably ice eight excellent forward lines, it's quite likely that there will teams, with an 's', in Vancouver with a better defensive corps. Because right now we're looking at a field of Pronger, Phillips, and 25 guys with non-trivial holes in their games (based on Nov/Dec Phaneuf anyway; October Phaneuf could be pencilled in for 25 minutes a game).

**I admire Allan Muir's work at SI a lot -- I'd put him in the Top 5 of paid hockey writers -- so it is with both surprise and horror that I report: of all the terrible ideas suggested to "help" the NHL in the past several years, the one he is marketing in yesterday's piece is the. worst. of. them. all.

**Interesting data point on the quality of the 2008 draft: Canada's final roster for the World Juniors includes five draft eligible players, named to the squad ahead of:
  • the #8, #10, #20, #27, #32, #41, and #47 picks from the 2007 draft
  • the #16 and #26 picks from the 2006 draft
Of the roster players who are drafted, none are prospects of the Flames or Oilers (or any Canadian team, for that matter)

**Prediction: more skyyy-rockets in flight.

Calgary 5 (Iginla x2, Langkow, Conroy, Regehr)
City of Champions 3 (Richards x2, some guy)

Go Flames.

33 comments:

  1. Because right now we're looking at a field of Pronger, Phillips, and 25 guys with non-trivial holes in their games

    I dont know. Bouwmeester is really starting to look like an elite all around guy to me.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's fair enough -- I really haven't seen enough of the guy (or anyone in the EC) to say... I can only go off of numbers & reputation.

    I think the general point holds though... the 4th line for every other country will be NHL role players (certainly not All-Stars anyway). But on D, just looking at a few other countries:

    USA:
    Rafalski-Komisarek
    Whitney-Paul Martin
    Gilbert-Eaton
    (Schneider, Sauer, Finger, Carle, Gleason, Corvo)

    Sweden:
    Lidstrom-Ohlund
    Kronvall-Johnsson
    Backman-Tallinder
    (Lilja, Norstrom)

    Czech:
    T.Kaberle-Kuba
    Hamrlik-Klesla
    Zidlicky-Kubina
    (Hejda, Rachunek, Roszival, Skoula, Michalek)

    Russia's top 4 are Zubov-Volchenkov & Gonchar-Markov

    Not only does Canada not have any clearance, talent-wise, on the blueline, but the Czechs and quite likely the Americans will have a better crew.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is Allan Muir from Toronto by any chance? Because the right to protect the best player out of the Toronto area would make sense for Leafs fans. Mind you, I suspect just about anything makes sense for Leafs fans...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Look out for Detroit.

    Michigan would promptly annex the entire nation of Sweden to protect their pipeline. :)

    (Seriously, I think it's a horrible idea as well.)

    ReplyDelete
  5. If Kipper keeps up his pace tonight, I'm ready to pronounce him cured. It's going to be tough, however. I think our best chance depends on our forwards maintaing pressure. Something similar to St. Louis period 2.

    Oh, and not taking penalties is important. And unavoidable. Any bets on how many tripping/hooking penalties will be called as a result of bad clearing attempts?

    If we win this game, I hope with Mackle the start tomorrow. If we lose, we'd be crazy to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This isn't going to be a fun game to listen to.

    ReplyDelete
  7. And another reason for Phanuef's recent struggles: being paired with Anders Eriksson. What a gloriously stupid play he made to basically give the Bolts their second goal.

    Lord I hate that guy.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wow...this game is nuts.

    Actually worth the money for a change.

    ReplyDelete
  9. metro: I think you went a bit light on your predictions.

    I wonder if Denis will be any better?

    ReplyDelete
  10. metro: I think you went a bit light on your predictions.

    I had it right for about 80 seconds.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Filip Kuba is at -3 right now. I like that we've taken 20% off his plus/minus in less than one period.

    Wow, another mistake, another goal.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Phaneuf was picked on that last goal against. Like, hugely, obviously.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Phaneuf was picked on that last goal against.

    Did he LEAP out of the way?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Did he LEAP out of the way?

    Sadly, no. He should have Torres'd his way through it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Crap. Another giveaway, another goal.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Worst game for Sarich as a Flame. He's given the puck up for no reason at least 3 times this period. The last one was an unforced, needless pass up the middle with his players leaving the zone. It was stunningly stupid.

    This game's going to be ugly. Hale and Eriksson are weak enough, but the Flames don't have a prayer when one of their shut-down guys is playing terribly too.

    ReplyDelete
  17. We've been shutdown by replacement goal tenders before. We better not do that again tonight.

    Nevermind, we finally get a hattrick!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yeah, our defence is playing like crap, all around, except maybe Regehr. (I'm sure he has a giveaway or two coming up.) Thankfully it's not total goals, but goal differential. As long as Kiprusoff outplays Denis, and our forwards outplay theirs, we can still win this.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 5-4? What the hell is going on in this game?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Yeah, don't blink, you'll miss a goal.

    Kipper earned that last goal. Delay of game is a really dumb penalty. Right up there with too many men.

    ReplyDelete
  21. How is this game which we have waited 3+ years to see not on TV.

    Oh right. Sportsnedmonton is carrying the Oilers and the Wings.

    Go Flames.

    Go Wings.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Rock on! Never a dull moment.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Good call on Holmqvist, Matt. The goaltending problems continue in Tampa.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Two hat tricks?

    This is ridiculous. But in a good way.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Iginla is finishing some unfinished business.

    3 years too late, but still. Go Flames.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I just got home from dinner and the Zoo Lights and all I can say is holy crap! 9-6?! Craziness.

    ReplyDelete
  27. +6 for Huselius, -6 for Kuba and Ranger. 5 assists for Phaneuf. This is the kind of game I would have happily paid $12 for.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I liked the part where Vinny bagged 3P and went -4...

    Can we swap this game for the last one we played there?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Iginla, you magnificent bastard!!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Two hat tricks in one game. Huselius +6. Iginla shows up Lecavalier in his own barn.

    What a night.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Uglier than the Brind'amour-LeClaire lovechild.

    But screw it, who cares? Three in a row on the road, 10 points in 12 games . . . I don't care how bad the wins are.

    I imagine some people will look at how bad our defense was this game and get worried. I say look at it this way: if November never happened, we would look at a game like this and say a good team finds a way to win even when some players suck.

    ReplyDelete